...
INSPIRE provides the governance structure for the data covered. When revising the directive reflection is also needed on optimizing the governance structure:
| # | Question | Comments |
|---|
| 2.1 | Who should be responsible for the governance of - collecting/assessing the requirements,
- identification of core datasets,
- endorsment of technical solutions.
| - This strongly depends on how many details are regulated in the Directive/Implementing Acts and how much is left to guidance or standardisation.
- What is meant here by “identification core data sets”? The definition of what data sets shall be in scope of the revised Directive? Or who in each MS identifies which of the data sets comply with that definition?
- The development of technical solution could be left to technical communities (e.g. in the GDDS), projects or standardisation bodies. There should still be a step of formal endorsement of recommended solutions (similar to the current Good Practice Process)
|
| 2.2 | How should it be organised? | - The current process for the management of Good Practices and artefacts seems to work well
|
| 2.3 | What will be the costs/who will cover? | - The development should be community-driven (and –paid), the endorsement and management process should be covered by the EC
|
Question 3: Data confidentially (mechanism, standards)
...
| # | Question | Comments |
|---|
| 4.1 | What will be the needs for capacity building for green and digital skills to capture evolving data needs in the field of the environment on the side of the: - Data providers (share data as-is)
- Data Intermediaries* (harmonization, additional processing, product development)
- Users (data product requirements)
* A data intermediary under the DGA is an entity that facilitates the sharing of data between various parties while ensuring neutrality, transparency, and compliance with strict regulatory requirements to protect the interests of both data subjects (individuals) and data holders (providers, intermediaries). | - I assume this question mainly aims on the needs for capacity building a revised INSPIRE Directive should (somehow) support.
- Data providers: Metadata, APIs, licences, shared vocabularies, data models, identifiers, versioning/archiving
- Data intermediaries: data harmonisation/ETL, business models, privacy enhancing technologies
- Users: Metadata, APIs, licences, shared vocabularies, data models, identifiers, versioning/archiving
|
| 4.2 | What are the costs/efforts that will be transferred? | - Unclear what is meant by "cost/effort transfer" here.
|
Question 5: Simplify and reduce burden of EU data sharing legislation
...