Versionen im Vergleich

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.

...

  • #6 - new attributes to include links to the schema repository and to the UML model → approved
  • #14 - 5 items have no descriptions → approved, but expert input needed for missing descriptions (e. g. European Geological Survey)
  • #28 - on hold, change in TG of natural risk zones is needed first
  • #34 - IR references Interinstitutional style guide → CP rejected, but reference link should be changed (new change proposal to change the link to Interinstitutional style guide and use two-letter codes)

06.05.2024 Status Meeting

Teilnehmende (de)

Daniela Witter 

Präsentation

Notizen

Change proposals on INSPIRE Technical Guidance

https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22for+Sub-group%22

  • #172 - View Services TG - Deprecate WMS 1.1.1

Image Added

    • DE: WMS 1.1.1 is still partly used in Germany, as it has proven itself and is considered by some data providers to be more reliable than 1.3.0. Therefore, I cannot agree today.
    • PL: From Polish perspective we prefere WMS 1.3 and don't recomment to use v1.1.1. 
    • DK: I agree with the change proposal.
    • ES: In Spain the WMS INSPIRE services are 1.3.0.
    • IT: In Italy is acepted only 1.3.0.
    • PL: But if some countries use v1.1.1 eg. DE, the TG could be stay without changes and the MS's can decided what version use.
    • Wait for additional feedback. DE will add some further explanation to the ticket.
  • #173 - LU - Correct broken link
    • sub-group approved change proposal - trivial change, can be changed without further vote of MIG/MIG-T
  • #174 - GE - Major update of TG to version 3.3
    • sub-group approved change proposal, pull request on concrete changes will be provided for the next MIG-T Meeting
    • corresponding changes in the registry, schemas and validator

Change proposals on INSPIRE Schemas

https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22for+Sub-group%22

  • #123 - PF_Link from ProductionSite to ProductionFacility is missing
    • DK: no mistake, information is in the data itself
    • JRC: If not wrong INSPIRE D2.5 was recommending only unidirectional relationships.
    • more evidence needed, DK will add a comment

Change proposals on INSPIRE Registry

https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/helpdesk-registry/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22for+Sub-group%22

  • intermediate release 2024.1b (changes derived from the amendment of interoperability regulation
  • #92 - add CRS EPSG:3794 to the list of accepted CRS, consider adding EPSG:4326 as well
    • JRC: EPSG:4326 should NOT be added
    • sub-group approved change proposal
  • #84-#87 - translation issues DE
    • sub-group approved change proposals
  • #17 - add 2 new items in the Protocol Value code list
    • sub-group approved change proposal
  • #71 - the code list for the country codes has to refer to the Interinstitutional style guide
  • #28 - INSPIRE layer register
    • IT: change of technical guidelines not necessary
    • go ahead with the change proposal, but not foreseen for the next release
  • #21 - inconsistencies
    • JRC propose not to correct this minor inconsistencies (too much effort and minor benefit)
    • sub-group agreed to reject change proposal

Announcements